Marketing · AEO & GEO

Help answer systems understand what your company does and why it matters.

We sample buyer questions, check company facts and inspect visible citations before scoping AEO or GEO implementation.

Specialist reviewConfidentialNo obligation
AnswersService content built around real buyer questions
EntityConsistent company facts and structured information
SourcesRelevant project evidence and citation gaps
Complimentary assessment

Get a complimentary AEO & GEO assessment.

Tell us your goal and where things stand. A Stonebridge consultant will review your starting point and recommend the next step, at no charge.

Protected by Cloudflare Turnstile.
A Stonebridge consultant will review your submission and recommend the next step.
Service delivery

Is the problem discovery, description or recommendation?

We sample buyer questions, check company facts and inspect visible citations before scoping AEO or GEO implementation.

Review
Is the problem discovery, description or recommendation?

A company that is described accurately by name but absent from service-selection questions needs a different review from a company described with the wrong services.

EntityConsistent company facts and structured information
SourcesRelevant project evidence and citation gaps
TestsDated prompts, answers and citation records
Stonebridge delivery path

AI-search readiness

Can an answer engine understand what the company actually does?

AEO & GEOScope stays evidence-led
01
Review answerability

Review content for clarity, entity signals, and answerability

02
Map services and questions

Map services, audiences, problems, and proof points

03
Improve the content

Rewrite pages into direct answer-friendly structures

04
Align facts and monitor

Add structured language, FAQs, and profile alignment

The sequence is illustrative of the review framework. The written engagement confirms the actual scope.

Where the work needs clarity

Is the problem discovery, description or recommendation?

We sample buyer questions, check company facts and inspect visible citations before scoping AEO or GEO implementation.

01

50

pages restructured for AI and answer-engine visibility

02

70

FAQs, structured answers or schema elements added per project

03

6

search and AI environments targeted

AEO & GEO review

Can an answer engine understand what the company actually does?

Stonebridge reviews how the website explains services, audiences and supporting facts. The work connects answer-friendly content with consistent entity information and a defined set of visibility questions.

Request the assessment →
01

Are the answers explicit?

Check whether a page directly answers the buyer’s question instead of relying on vague positioning.

02

Are the entity facts consistent?

Compare the company description, service language and public profiles for contradictions.

03

Which visibility gap matters?

Distinguish being described incorrectly from being absent in category or recommendation questions.

Available deliverables

AEO & GEO: the work to scope.

The full engagement is scoped after the initial review; these items are not all included in the free audit. Read the full service scope.

AEO content structure

GEO content planning

FAQ architecture

Entity clarity review

Service-answer mapping

AI-search visibility direction

AEO & GEO workflow

From unclear service information to answer-ready pages.

Review content for clarity, entity signals, and answerability. The next stages follow the agreed service scope.

01

Review answerability

Review content for clarity, entity signals, and answerability

02

Map services and questions

Map services, audiences, problems, and proof points

03

Improve the content

Rewrite pages into direct answer-friendly structures

04

Align facts and monitor

Add structured language, FAQs, and profile alignment. Monitor gaps in AI-search and answer-engine visibility.

Scope assurance

AEO & GEO: responsibilities and limits.

Content structure, FAQs and profile alignment are within the agreed work. AI platforms choose their own answers and citations; Stonebridge cannot guarantee recommendations.

  • AEO content structure
  • GEO content planning
  • FAQ architecture
Project fit

Is this the right stage for aeo & geo?

Can an answer engine understand what the company actually does?

Strong fit

  • ✓ An established offering with accurate facts and material to improve
  • ✓ A defined set of buyer questions or observed AI-visibility problems

Not a fit

  • × A request to fabricate authority signals
  • × An expectation that a schema change forces an AI recommendation
Related client work

Public-authority and corporate-profile work

Mati Carbon

Mati Carbon

Making complex carbon-removal work understandable, source-led, and credible

View case study →
What is the difference between SEO, AEO, and GEO?

SEO improves how a website performs in traditional search results. AEO focuses on making the information clear enough for answer engines to extract and present directly. GEO focuses on improving how generative AI systems understand, cite, and potentially recommend the person, company, service, or content. Stonebridge treats them as connected rather than competing services. The same strong website, factual entity information, useful content, structured data, evidence, and authority signals support all three.

Does my business still need traditional SEO if I want to appear in AI-generated answers?

Yes. Stonebridge does not treat AEO or GEO as a replacement for SEO. AI systems often rely on information that is already crawlable, structured, understandable, and supported by the wider web. A weak site with poor indexing, unclear services, and little authority is not fixed by adding a few AI-focused FAQs. Stonebridge normally strengthens the search foundation and the AI-answer structure together so the business can be found both through traditional search and generative answers.

Which AI assistants and answer engines can an AEO/GEO campaign target?

Stonebridge builds the website and public authority so major search and AI systems can understand the business consistently. That can include visibility testing across ChatGPT, Google Gemini and AI search experiences, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Perplexity, and other relevant answer systems. The goal is not to create separate fake content for every platform. It is to build one strong factual and authoritative web presence that multiple systems can interpret correctly.

What changes are made to a website to help AI systems understand and cite it?

Stonebridge can improve company definitions, service-page answers, entity facts, headings, internal links, schema, metadata, case studies, reviews, FAQs, company facts, leadership information, article structure, and supporting evidence. We also make sure the site is indexable and accessible to the appropriate search crawlers. The content is written to answer real buyer questions clearly while still reading naturally for people. AEO is not a hidden technical trick; it is a clearer and better-supported public information structure.

Can Stonebridge guarantee that ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Claude, or Perplexity will recommend my company?

No. Those systems control their own generated answers. Stonebridge can improve the company's eligibility to be understood, cited, and recommended, but it cannot directly command an outside AI assistant to include a particular company. What Stonebridge can guarantee are the contracted AEO/GEO deliverables, audits, website improvements, content, schema, authority work, and any written campaign outputs. Recommendation visibility is then monitored objectively rather than sold as a guaranteed platform-controlled result.

How do you measure whether AEO and GEO are actually improving my AI visibility?

Stonebridge establishes a repeatable prompt benchmark and tests the same types of buyer questions across major AI assistants over time. We track whether the client is mentioned, cited, recommended, described accurately, and how competitors appear. We also record which pages are being used, branded and non-branded visibility, referral traffic where available, search movement, and resulting enquiries. One successful prompt is not treated as proof of the whole campaign; the pattern is measured across repeated tests.

Complimentary assessment →
Complimentary assessment →